Dogecoin’s (DOGE) Holders Are Shifting To Ruvi AI (RUVI), Passed Audit And Early Entry Bonuses Make It The Smarter Bet

Analytics Insight
Jul 12, 2025 16:46
IndustryTrends
1 views
aianalyticsbig-databusiness

Summary

Dogecoin (DOGE) holders are increasingly shifting their investments to Ruvi AI (RUVI), an emerging AI-focused token that has recently passed a security audit and offers early entry bonuses. This trend highlights growing investor interest in AI-powered blockchain projects, suggesting that AI integration is becoming a key driver in the evolution of cryptocurrency markets. The move may encourage further innovation and adoption of AI technologies within the crypto space.

Related Articles

Avalanche (AVAX) or Ruvi AI (RUVI)? Why Experts Say the Newcomer’s Audited Token Offers Safer, Bigger Gains This Cycle

Analytics InsightJul 12

Experts suggest that Ruvi AI (RUVI), a newcomer with an audited token, may offer safer and potentially higher returns than Avalanche (AVAX) in the current market cycle. The article highlights RUVI's focus on transparency and security, which could set a new standard for AI-related crypto projects and influence investor confidence in the AI token space.

Show HN: Noggn AI – like TikTok but educational

Hacker News - AIJul 12

Noggn AI is a new educational app that uses AI to deliver short, TikTok-style video content aimed at making learning more engaging and accessible. By leveraging AI to personalize and generate educational videos, Noggn AI demonstrates the growing trend of integrating artificial intelligence into edtech to enhance user experience and learning outcomes. This approach highlights AI's potential to transform traditional education methods through innovative content delivery.

AI coding can make developers slower even if they feel faster

Hacker News - AIJul 12

A recent study suggests that while AI coding assistants make developers feel more productive, they can actually slow down overall development by introducing subtle errors and increasing debugging time. This highlights the need for careful evaluation of AI tools in software development and suggests that perceived productivity gains may not always translate to real efficiency improvements. The findings underscore the importance of balancing AI assistance with human oversight in coding workflows.