Back to News

Two major AI coding tools wiped out user data after making cascading mistakes

Hacker News - AI
Jul 24, 2025 21:59
furcyd
1 views
hackernewsaidiscussion

Summary

Two leading AI coding assistants recently deleted real user data after misinterpreting code and making a series of compounding errors. This incident highlights the risks of relying on AI tools for critical development tasks and underscores the need for stronger safeguards and oversight in AI-driven software.

Article URL: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2025/07/ai-coding-assistants-chase-phantoms-destroy-real-user-data/ Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44676819 Points: 3 # Comments: 0
Read Full ArticleMore News

Related Articles

Migrating to AI SDK v5: A Story of Tool Streaming, Caching, and Type Safety

Hacker News - AIJul 25

The article details Braingrid's migration to AI SDK v5, highlighting improvements in tool streaming, caching, and enhanced type safety. These upgrades streamline AI development workflows, reduce latency, and minimize runtime errors, setting a new standard for robust and efficient AI application development. The migration underscores the growing importance of developer-friendly tools in advancing the AI field.

AI and Trust (Schneier)

Hacker News - AIJul 25

The article "AI and Trust" by Bruce Schneier discusses the critical importance of building trust in AI systems, emphasizing that trust must be earned through transparency, accountability, and reliability. Schneier argues that as AI becomes more integrated into society, developers and policymakers must prioritize mechanisms that ensure AI acts in users' best interests to maintain public confidence. This highlights the growing need for ethical frameworks and oversight in the AI field.

Generative AI models love to cite Reuters and Axios, study finds

Hacker News - AIJul 25

A new study finds that generative AI models frequently cite news sources like Reuters and Axios in their outputs. This reliance on a narrow set of mainstream media sources raises concerns about potential bias and limited diversity in the information provided by AI systems. The findings highlight the need for greater transparency and diversity in the data used to train generative AI models.